The essence of Truth

Rafatiki ran up the mountain to: A. see the beautiful view B. feel the gratification of accomplishment C. lose weight D. feel the pleasure given by the stimulated endorphins E. get to school F. Something other than the above...

Where did he find the nourishment to provide the energy for this run?
Food no doubt, but from whence came this food?
As aid from the US or the UN. Still further,
from farmers paid by the government who plow
the fields in nebraska; from a seed, from
another previously existing plant, repeat
until "only God knows" or evolution
by some means of which we cannot be certain:

the point has now been obviously expressed: the whence of each thing carries back to an origin that cannot be explained with certainty: the regressive method of questioning is as futile as trying to say what a thing is: all essence is simply the appearance of a more fundamental essence.

Did I get sidetracked from trying to appear insane while concealing a meaning deeper than the ocean floor, I could even say the earths core? These two issues are intimately bound up with each other, the first being that the answer to the first question, which I didn't even put as an option, for if you have read all of my blogs you should know, is G. All of the above, for truth cannot only be one opinion or one side of the argument but must be the combination of all of them.

So I end this lesson on truth and essence with a fullstop.